This book
follows Tony Webster from his school days through to retirement. It explores
the idea of memory and it’s imperfections when Tony’s life and perception of
events is turned around by the arrival of a lawyers letter that throws up
surprises.
Overall
most of the members were unsure if they liked the book, they found the writing
often beautiful and the central theme of memory to be interesting and well
explored, however found the main character irritating and difficult to like and
that it was a bit repetitive and that they felt the author was showing off. It
was discussed that this was a literary book and it was felt that this was the
reason many members found it lacked storytelling and many found it a “sad story”
and a “passionless book”.
Many
members found the narrator to be dull and that he showed a lack of emotion and
they would have liked him to change in some way through the course of the book.
He showed denial around the main incident in the book and seemed to have
created his own history, which he had to confront and reflect on towards the
end of the book. As this was a single narrative many felt that the other
characters were sketchy and that they were not in the book enough to get to
understand them properly. The members found Veronica to be complex but
humourless and that the hatred she felt towards Tony was not explained. She was
meant to be aloof and many found that this took away from her character. It was
felt that Adrian
was well drawn but again his role was more as a device for the narrator’s story
to unfold around.
We spent
very little time discussing the plot as it was felt that the book was built
around the themes not the story. The main theme being memory and how this can
be distorted, this rang a bell with many members and they felt that it had been
very well done. Another theme that ran through the book linked in with the
theme of memory was the idea of what is history. These were discussed during
their school days in a somewhat pretentious way and the idea about evidence and
interpretation wove through the book. This led to a discussion on the nature of
perception and facebook. We also discussed the theme of suicide at some length
and the way that the first suicide was felt to be weird and received with a
lack of empathy by the school boys and the idea of it being a “blaze of glory”
was a bit uncomfortable. It was felt that overall this theme was not well
developed and was shown as being more about intellectual reasons and philosophy
which didn’t hold true through the book.
There were
mixed views of the writers style. Overall it was felt to be too factual and dry
and therefore not very moving, some didn’t finish the book as didn’t feel
inclined to care. The letters were seen as a good device which grabbed the
reader however the writer style was lacking in peaks and troughs and this meant
that the book didn’t grab many of the members. It was felt that the book
evocated the sense of the period it was set in. Some members would read another
short book by this author but not many would bother with a longer one.
The ending
was shocking but because it was dealt with in such a factual manner many felt
that they had missed something and had to check back to make sure they had
understood. Some felt that they weren’t sure they
got the ending either, while understanding it they didn’t understand why
veronica kept saying to him "you still don't get it". There were felt
to be too many questions left hanging that people just didn’t care enough
about. There was manly relief at it being
tied up and done and there was a general apathy towards the book.
Write up by Vicki R
No comments:
Post a Comment